Mar. 2, 2015

Land swap could provide beach parking closer to Sunrise Boulevard

By Larry Barszewski
Sun Sentinel

FORT LAUDERDALE — A city land swap could help divert beach traffic from Las Olas Boulevard to Sunrise Boulevard by creating more public parking further north on the beach.

The owner of a vacant State Road A1A parcel on the north side of Vistamar Street next to the historic Bonnet House has offered to exchange the 1.6-acre property for the city-owned Sebastian Street parking lot about 11 blocks to the south.

The sale would be contingent on developers receiving approval for a large project on the Sebastian Street site. The developer, Barefoot Contessa LLC, has promised to retain at least the same number of public parking spaces as currently exist at the Sebastian Street location as part of any project.

The northern site, known as the Natchez property, has had difficulty being developed commercially because of its proximity to the Bonnet House. In 2003, commissioners rejected a proposed 22-story condominium on the site.

"We're not going to allow a building to overwhelm the Bonnet House," Mayor Jack Seiler said.

City officials have been pursuing a possible land swap because of the difficulty they've faced expanding parking at the Sebastian Street site. There are two privately owned properties needed to construct a parking garage there and the owners have been uninterested in selling, officials said.

Seiler said the city could probably use bonds that would be paid back using parking fees to pay for a three- or four-story garage on the Natchez property. He's also interested in seeing streetfront businesses along A1A as part of a garage complex.

Commissioner Dean Trantalis thinks the developer should provide more public parking on Sebastian Street than the current 79 spaces. And he said he's not going to embrace the idea until he knows what would be built on Sebastian Street.

"We don't know what the developer plans to do with the property," Trantalis said. "We have to make sure it fits in with neighborhood compatibility."

The developer's proposal is meant to start "initial negotiations and discussions," attorney Stephanie Toothaker said in a February letter to commissioners.

Under the developer's proposed agreement, Barefoot Contessa would have a year to try to obtain any necessary zoning and site plan approvals for the Sebastian Street property before any swap would occur.

Residents near Las Olas Boulevard have been concerned about current plans to build a parking garage on the north side of the Las Olas bridge and another one as part of the new aquatic center a few blocks south of Las Olas. They fear the projects will lead to more beach traffic coming down Las Olas.

Parking on the Natchez property, being closer to Sunrise, would help divert some of that traffic to Sunrise. It would also provide parking for the nearby North Beach Village, which is planning to develop restaurants and other businesses to go along with its rehabilitated, 1950s-era motels.


Sun Sentinel article link:



Lease Agreements and Attorney Review: Invest Now or Later

SPECIAL REPORT by Tripp Scott's Matthew Zifrony as published in the FLORIDA TREND

A current or prospective tenant is presented with a lease contract with
several seemingly untenable terms. The landlord says the contract is non-negotiable. The tenant takes him at his word, quickly signs and returns the contract, and hopes nothing bad arises.

Bankruptcy Courts' Powers to Sanction Attorneys, Others Expanded by New Appellate Ruling

As Published in the Daily Business Review

An Op-Ed featuring analysis from Tripp Scott's Chuck Tatelbaum and Corey Cohen

While it has been long recognized that bankruptcy courts have the power to sanction attorneys and litigants pursuant to Rule 9011 of the Bankruptcy Rules of Procedure (a rule that is almost identical in substance to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), a recent appellate ruling clarifies and expands the power and authority of bankruptcy courts to sanction attorneys and litigants based upon the inherent power of the bankruptcy court as well as the broad authority granted by Section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. 

Critical Drafting Considerations for LLC Members' Operating Agreements

SPECIAL REPORT featuring analysis from Tripp Scott's Paul O. Lopez and Brittany Hynes

As Published in the Daily Business Review

If an operating agreement is in place and not drafted correctly, the parties could inadvertently broaden this narrow exception under Florida law and create avenues for direct claims by and between one another which are not generally available to them under the Florida Revised Limited Liability Company Act (the Revised LLC Act).

Start a Conversation

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.