Dec. 1, 2016

South Florida Real Estate Fraud

By Richard L. Petrovich

Real estate fraud can happen to anyone.  Institutional lenders are victims.  Private mortgage lenders are victims. Small businesses and individuals are victims. Through this blog, we attempt to locate articles and press releases and identify the various mechanics and schemes fraudsters use to commit mortgage fraud. 

This November, several individual defendants pled guilty to mortgage fraud in Federal District Court in Miami, stemming from fraud committed against institutional lenders back in 2008.  See Case 1:16-cr-20730-FAM; 1:16-cr-20729-KMW. Specifically, the Defendants were charged with violations of 18 U.S.C. 1344 (Bank and Wire Fraud).  In these cases, it appears as though bad actors recruited straw purchasers and passed these purchasers off to institutional lenders as qualified mortgage loan applicants, and in so doing, induced the purchasers to aid in falsifying mortgage loan applications, falsifying related supporting documentation, and misleading institutional lenders regarding earnest money deposits being held by defendants on the straw purchasers’ behalf.  According to the factual proffers, the straw purchasers were not qualified to obtain the loans and many if not all of the income verification documents were falsified by the closing agencies.  Apparently, these straw purchasers were induced to apply to purchase condominium units by the promise that the units came with paying tenants and were income producing.  Based on the false mortgage applications, various institutional lenders lent money to these otherwise unqualified purchasers and the loans closed.  According to court records, substantial portions of the loans were used to pay various “marketing fees,” which were as nothing more than “kick- backs” which the straw purchasers received.  The remaining proceeds were distributed for the benefit of other defendants who controlled the closing agencies and for the benefit of unnamed co-conspirators.  Nothing seems to have been remitted to the unit’s sellers.  All told, the amount of monies lent by the various institutions via this fraudulent scheme exceeded 1.9 million dollars.  Sentencing for the defendants is currently set for January 19, 2017 and March 28, 2017 respectively. 

Categories


Fresh


Ignorance Is Not Bliss: Demystifying Executory Contracts in Bankruptcy Cases

An executory contract can create havoc for the unsuspecting counterparty. 

Most businesses are (reluctantly) required to deal with customers, suppliers and counterparties to agreements that enter bankruptcy proceedings, yet there is a great lack of knowledge as to how the concept of an executory contract can create havoc for the unsuspecting creditor/counterparty. Recent litigation in Delaware involving the sporting goods retailer Eastern Outfitters LLC (Eastern Mountain Sports and Bob’s Stores) points to some of the issues.

 

Evening of Wine & Cheese

A private reception
Tuesday, February 28, 2015
5:30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m. 
Timpano’s Italian Chophouse 

Lawyer Up: As Retail Bankruptcies Increase, Creditors Must Be Vigilant

Virtually no attention has been paid to what will soon be a big problem

While much has been written about the future of brick-and-mortar retailing as a result of the large number of retail bankruptcies during 2016 and even during the first weeks of 2017, virtually no attention has been paid to what will be a significant problem for creditors of those retailers that have sought bankruptcy court protection—even if some of the retail locations remain open.

Start a Conversation




The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.